Assessments+and+Rubrics


 * **Final Formative Assessment ****Wiki Discussions ** ||
 * Initial Post || The student made at least 2 discussion post to the wikis of the assigned classes. Each post addressed research on the topic or an idea or comment on the essential questions. The post was relevant and useful to the outcome of the project. || 5 points ||
 * Responses || The student made at least two responses in the discussion area. Responses were in the form of a relevant question or comment. (These post were addressed to two different classmates.) || 5 points ||
 * Total ||  || 10 points ||

=**3rd Grade Glogster Poster Project: Recycling**=
 * Final Summative Assessment **
 * CATEGORY || Excellent 4 || Good 3 || Fair 1-2 || Poor 0 ||
 * Content || The project includes at least six accurate facts about recycling. || There are at least 4 accurate facts about recycling. || There are only only 2 accurate facts listed. || There are no facts listed or the facts are not accurate. ||
 * Writing and Grammar || There are no spelling mistakes on the glog, and it is easy to understand. || There are only a few mistakes on the glog. The main concepts are written in an understandable way. || There are several mistakes on the glog, the concepts are a bit "fuzzy", hard to understand the main concepts. || There are many mistakes on the glog, and the concepts are unclear. ||
 * Layout || The overall look of the glog is really nice; the images are all organized and spread out on the entire page evenly. There are not too few images, or too many images. The page is not cluttered or bare. || All the images are organized nicely, they are mostly spread out evenly on the entire glog. || There are not enough or too many images, the layout could be neater. || There are no images, or too few images or the appearance of the glog is sloppy/not even spread out across the entire glog ||
 * Citations/Resources || All of the information contained in the glog is cited properly. || Some of the information contained in the glog is cited properly. || Few of the information contained in the glog are cited properly. || None of the information contained in the glog is cited. ||
 * Creativity || The project is colorful, and includes information from several different websites, as well as fun activities to do. || The project is colorful; All the information is pretty good, and there is at least one fun thing to do. || Project could be more colorful; there could be more information, and more fun activities. || Project could be more colorful, there isn't a lot of information and little to no fun things to do. ||
 * Collaboration || The student used all of the tools provided in the MentorMob playlist to communicate with members of the participating classroom. The communication was constructive and positive. || The student used some of the tools provided in the MentorMob playlist to communicate with members of the participating classroom. The communication was constructive and positive. || The student used the tools provided in the MentorMob playlist to communicate with members of the participating classroom. However, The communication was not constructive or positive. || The student did not use the tools provided in the MentorMob playlist to communicate with members of the participating classrooms. ||
 * Overall quality ||  ||   || The project is neat, organized, the information is accurate, and all the images, video and audio relate to the topic. (2 pts) || The project could be improved in quality; could be more organized, have more accurate information and more video, audio, and images (0 pts.) ||